![]() The trial court ordered the District to produce the surveillance video and determined plaintiff was the prevailing party entitled to an award of $8,046.50 in attorney’s fees. ![]() The trial court found for plaintiff under both OPRA and the common law right of access. Plaintiff also argued the common law right of access to the security footage “outweighs the governmental need for confidentiality.” The alleged incident was purportedly captured on two of the elementary school’s security cameras.Īfter the District denied the request for the surveillance video, plaintiff filed a verified complaint in the Superior Court of New Jersey seeking an order to show cause against the District, requesting the court require the District produce the requested security footage and sought attorney’s fees. The request for the surveillance video arose after plaintiff, Helen Zezza, alleges she was threatened and accosted after her grandson’s baseball game at the elementary school. 159 (2016) for the premise the case created a categorical OPRA exception for all public surveillance videos. The District denied the request for the video footage on the basis of the security exception to OPRA and the case of Gilleran v. The appeal arose from a citizen’s request under the Open Public Records Act (“OPRA”) and the common law right of access, for approximately thirty-five (35) seconds of surveillance footage taken from two cameras at an elementary school within the Evesham Township School District (“District”). On June 29, 2023, the New Jersey Appellate Division issued an unpublished opinion in the matter of Zezza v. In NJ School Law, Open Public Records Act
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |